This newsletter was originally published in August 2023
In each issue, Bottle Bill Common Ground will explain a single principle or practice for a meaningful, modern DRS. We will cover topics such as ease of use for consumers, production standards for industry, and compliance and enforcement measures for government.
By following this roadmap, states can achieve major environmental and economic benefits
We are now focused on 10 essential practices — requirements on how to build, run, and maintain a modern deposit return system (DRS) for beverage containers.
Practice #5: Design, marking and registration for containers
Design, Marking, and Registration for Containers that are standardised and uniform leads to optimised recovery, enhanced recyclability, and accurate accounting. Universal marking of every container with a barcode allows tracking by brand, beverage type, and deposit amount. This prevents fraudulent redemption, reduces system costs, and facilitates transparency in the DRS. Every brand owner in a given deposit state registers their barcode(s) with the appropriate regulatory agency, so all retailers and reverse vending machine (RVM) operators can get the codes to program their redemption machines
-
A Guide to Modern Deposit Return Systems: 10 Essential Practices
10 key requirements for successful implementation of a DRS to serve as a roadmap for policymakers, advocates, and producers seeking the best public policy solutions.
Design
Any number of design decisions are made before a beverage container is manufactured, such as shaping, sizing, thickness, and material type. These choices, made by the producer, play a critical role in determining the container’s potential for recovery and recycling within a closed-loop system. Having a set of design-for-recycling standards included in DRS legislation helps guide those choices from the very beginning of a container’s journey and ensures that it can be recovered and recycled in a closed-loop manner.
Some materials are not readily recyclable in current recycling processes because their design significantly degrades the quality of recycling streams. For example, polylactic acid (PLA) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) are contaminants in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling processes and reduce the quality of PET.
Elements to consider when designing beverage containers for recycling are detailed below.
Material composition:
- Separability of components
- Use of additives, fillers, and colourants
- Use of sleeves and labels
Material form:
- Shape, size, and thickness
- Product residues (how easy the product is to empty of its content)
- Barriers and coatings
Toxicity:
- Material
- Labelling and adhesive
- Printing ink
Legislation that specifies the use of modulated producer fees can help incentivise eco-design. This means that fees paid by producers vary according to aspects of their product’s design, with more “economically recyclable” materials charged at a lower rate than difficult-to-recycle materials.
Marking
When it comes to marking and labelling the container itself, best practice dictates the use of standard text, like “Return for Refund,” and/or printing a logo, as well as a barcode, on each container for easy identification.
Barcodes can also enable RVMs to recognise and count each deposit container, in order to track which containers are returned. Barcodes also help to ensure that containers not eligible for redemption are not accidentally accepted. This provides a baseline level of system accountability.
Decisions on what level of marking and labelling to legislate are determined by a number of factors, including:
- Level of deposit
- Proximity of population centres in bordering markets
- Impacts on distribution of beverages
- Costs of additional labels (including redesign)
- Likely cost to system of fraudulent activity
Registration
Consumers must be able to return all eligible containers to any collection point, in order to create a convenient and effective system. Requiring brand owners to register their products with the system operator, who then provides that information to return point operators, is a direct way to help reach this goal.
High-performing DRSs around the world require beverage producers to provide the following information as part of the registration process:
- Company name and contact information
- Beverage container information, such as brand/product name/flavour, volume, material type and colour
- Barcode
Case Study: Norway
Beverage containers in Norway’s DRS, which is run by Infinitum, must adhere to detailed specifications that regulate the type of materials used, as well as the thickness, physical shape, and dimensions of containers that enter the system. Before launching on the market, each product and related beverage container requires registration with Infinitum. During the registration process, the container’s deposit marking and barcode are checked to ensure that they can be identified using automated collection or counting equipment. The registration process includes marking containers with a standardised deposit logo and submitting the barcode to Infinitum to ensure they can be correctly scanned by RVMs. Eco-design standards inform the fees for materials in the DRS. For example, producers are charged higher fees for coloured containers or those with a sleeve that covers 75% or more of the container.
In Norway, manufacturers can choose between a universal barcode, which allows beverages to be sold in both Norway and Sweden, or a barcode unique to Norway. Unique barcodes carry lower fees since they minimise the risk of fraud: these items are only sold in the Norwegian market, and a deposit fee for them is paid in Norway. While universal barcodes may save producers other operational costs, they carry higher fees to cover the cost of increased fraud, as a consumer can redeem a container bearing the same barcode but sold in a place where they have not been charged a deposit.
Get the latest from Reloop
We’ll send occasional email updates with details of our work. You can unsubscribe from our emails at any time and we won’t pass on your information to anyone else.

Issue #14:
Oversight & Enforcement
Issue #16:
Collection standards